<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id" xml:lang="en">Two centuries of the Russian classics</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Two centuries of the Russian classics</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn publication-format="electronic">2686-7494</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name xml:lang="en">IWL RAS</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2025-7-4-90-135</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="article-type" xml:lang="en">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading" xml:lang="en">
          <subject>Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Controversy Between the Slavophiles and Westernizers About Personality and the Choice of Direction for Russian Literature</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western" xml:lang="en">
            <surname>Viktor  M.  Guminsky</surname>
          </name>
          <email>red@rusklassika.ru</email>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-12-25" publication-format="electronic">
          <day>25</day>
          <month>12</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </pub-date>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>90</fpage>
      <lpage>135</lpage>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>personality</kwd>
        <kwd>Westerners</kwd>
        <kwd>Slavophiles</kwd>
        <kwd>peasant  community</kwd>
        <kwd>A. S. Pushkin</kwd>
        <kwd>N. V. Gogol</kwd>
        <kwd>K. S. Aksakov</kwd>
        <kwd>drama</kwd>
        <kwd>art</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2026, IWL RAS</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>For the first time in literary studies, this article raises the question of the influence of Professor S. P. Shevyrev’s lectures on Old Russian literature on the development of literary and social processes in Russia in the mid-19th century. The concept of the author’s personality in the early stages of Old Russian chronicling proved relevant to contemporaries. Shevyrev’s observation prompted Gogol to rethink “Selected Passages from Correspondence with Friends,” where he attempted to use his own example to call readers to spiritual renewal. Shevyrev’s thought largely became defining for the Slavophile movement. This article explores the opposing approaches to the question of personality through a problematic and analytical review of the journal debate between Westernizers and Slavophiles. For Westerners, the formation of a self-valuable individual determined the socio-cultural progress of Western European countries, unlike Russia, where the “principles of personality” were absent, at least until Peter the Great. Slavophiles believed that the central principle in the development of the Russian concept of personality was the Christian principle of conciliarity, realized in the life of the peasant community and the Orthodox Church: each individual voluntarily sacrifices their own interests for the sake of a common goal.</abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Averintsev, S. S. “Dve prirody ikony” [“Two Natures of the Icon”]. MEƩHMBPIA. Bolgaro­russkii sbornik [MEƩHMBPIA. Bulgarian­Russian Collection]. Sofia, Slavika Publ., 1999. 482 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Vinogradov, V. V. Istoriia slov [History of Words]. Moscow, Tolk Publ., 1994. 1138 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Vinogradov, I. A. Letopis’ zhizni i tvorchestva N. V. Gogolia: v 7 t. [Chronicle of N. V. Gogol’s Life and Work: in 7 vols.], vol. 6: 1848–1850 [1848–1850]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2018. 665 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Guminskii, V. M. Russkaia literatura puteshestvii v mirovom istoriko­kul’turnom kontekste [Russian Travel Literature in the World Historical and Cultural Context]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2017. 607 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Guminskii, V. M. Zhizn’ i tvorchestvo N. V. Gogolia v kontekste khristianskoi traditsii [N. V. Gogol’s Life and Work in the Context of the Christian Tradition]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2024. 496 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Dmitriev, A. P. “Kommentarii” [“Commentaries”]. Shevyrev, S. P. Polnoe sobranie literaturno­kriticheskikh trudov: v 7 t. [Complete Collection of Literary and Critical Works: in 7 vols.], vol. 4. St. Petersburg, Rostok Publ., 2022, pp. 533–551. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Kulishova, O. V. “Khor v drevnegrecheskom teatre 5 veka do nashei eru” [“Chorus in the Ancient Greek Theater of the 5th Century BC”]. Maska i teatr v zrelishchnoi kul’ture antichnogo mira [Mask and Theater in the Spectacular Culture of the Ancient World]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University Publ., 2015. 267 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Losev, A. F. Imia. Izbrannye raboty, perevody, besedy, issledovaniia, arkhiv. Materialy [Name. Selected Works, Translations, Conversations, Research, Archival Materials]. St. Petersburg, Aleteia Publ., 1997. 616 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Mann, Iu. V. “Istoricheskoe napravlenie literaturovedcheskoi mysli” [“Historical Direction of Literary Thought”]. Vozniknovenie russkoi nauki o literature [The Emergence of Russian Literary Science]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1975. 464 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Nikoliukin, A. N. “S. P. Shevyrev i istoriia russkoi slovesnosti (K teorii slavianofil’stva)” [“S. P. Shevyrev and the History of Russian Literature (Toward a Theory of Slavophilism)”]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 7. Filosofiia, no. 1, 2021, pp. 3–21. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Poliakov, A. N. “Proiskhozhdenie Rusi i Velikaia Moraviia” [“The Origin of Rus’ and Great Moravia”]. Vestnik Vladikavkazskogo nauchnogo tsentra, vol. 22, no. 2, 2022, pp. 41–49. https://doi.org/10.46698/VNC.2022.85.86.001 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Podoroga V. A. Mimesis. Materialy po analiticheskoi antropologii literatury [Mimesis. Materials on the Analytical Anthropology of Literature], vol. 1: N. Gogol’, F. Dostoevskii [N. Gogol, F. Dostoevsky]. Moscow, Kul’turnaia revoliutsiia Publ., Logos Publ., Logos- altera Publ., 2006. 688 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Sofronova, L. A. Mifopoetika rannego Gogolia [Mythopoetics of Early Gogol]. St. Petersburg, Aleteia Publ., 2010. 296 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Fetisenko, O. L. Kokhanovskaia: “Stepnoi tsvetok” russkoi slovesnosti: Teksty i konteksty N. S. Sokhanskoi [Kokhanovskaya: “The Steppe Flower” of Russian Literature: Texts and Contexts of N. S. Sokhanskaya]. St. Petersburg, Pushkin House Publ., 2021. 424 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Freidenberg, O. M. Mif i literatura drevnosti [Myth and Literature of Antiquity]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1978. 605 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Shatalov, S. E. “Dramaticheskie proizvedeniia slavianofilov” [“Dramatic Works of the Slavophiles”]. Literaturnye vzgliady i tvorchestvo slavianofilov. 1830–1850 gody [Literary Views and Works of the Slavophiles. 1830–1850]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1975. 502 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Vernan, Jean-Pierre, and Pierre Vidal-Naquet. Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece. New York, Zone, 1988. 527 p. (In English)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
